Story
The patient featured in this case report is a 58 year old woman who attended physiotherapy at Diane Lee and Associates in late 2021 for left hip discomfort and unsteadiness in her left leg. Her objective was to resume being active and to learn self-management strategies. The patient will be referred to as Mrs W throughout.
Mrs W’s discomfort had been present in the left hip region for many years and worsened with walking, especially when taking longer steps. Mrs W was struck as a pedestrian at 16 years of age and this accident was very traumatic for her. She felt strongly that this did permanent damage to her body’s alignment and she avoids walking on busy streets for fear of being hit.
The left hip discomfort became even more noticeable after having a hysterectomy in her thirties. This “annoyance” in her body has worsened since spring 2021. The unsteadiness in Mrs W’s left leg was new, having been present on and off for the last year and worsening in the last few months. In January 2021, Mrs W slipped on black ice in her driveway while walking with groceries. Mrs W reported it happened so fast that although she got her left arm up, she fell on the right side of her face striking her right orbit and zygoma region. At the hospital she received stitches just above her right orbit. She was told she had been concussed and was told to rest for a few weeks.
Presently, the unsteadiness occurs while standing on the left leg while dressing her lower body or putting on her shoe. Since her concussion, she feels very off balance on her left leg and has to hold onto something to keep balanced. In comparison, her right leg is much steadier to stand on and she does not need to hold on.
Mrs W reported doing balance exercises and strength training for her glutes, thigh and calf muscles, but still feels very unsteady. She saw her doctor, who did an X-ray, which showed very mild osteoarthritis. A physical exam of her left hip by her doctor revealed full range of motion and strength and mild tenderness at her greater trochanter. Based on these findings, she was diagnosed with left hip bursitis. She was prescribed Diclofinac nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory ointment to apply on her hip, however this did not help. As the discomfort had not improved, Mrs W’s doctor referred her for a cortisone shot from the pain clinic, but unfortunately this made her symptoms worse.
Her general health history includes low blood pressure and gastro-esophageal reflux. She had a whiplash injury earlier in life. At 20, she had surgery on her right foot to correct a collapsed arch. Mrs W has two children, both born by vaginal birth with no complications. She had a hysterectomy in her late thirties due to endometriosis.
Mrs W works full time as a financial analyst. Activities she enjoys include salsa dancing and walking with her husband and both of these are impacted by her hip feeling uncomfortable and unsteady.
Diane’s question:
The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) recently updated the classification of pain into three phenotypes, nociceptive, neuropathic and nociplastic. Please provide a definition/description of each phenotype and then from your initial story classify, with reasoning, Mrs W’s pain.
Susannah’s response:
Nociceptive pain is an unpleasant sensation that arises from threatened or actual damage to non-neural structures such as muscle, ligament, tendon, bone via the stimulation of peripherally located nociceptors. Nociceptors send a message to alert the brain of a noxious stimulus in the case of a mechanical, chemical or temperature irritant. An example of nociceptive pain occurring is burning your tongue on a sip of hot coffee.
Neuropathic pain is a distinctly uncomfortable feeling that results from injury or disease of the neural structures of the body. It is characterized by sharp, shooting or burning quality that is contained to the distribution of the affected nerve. An example of neuropathic pain is irritation of the common peroneal nerve and the resultant numbness and tingling distinctly within the nerve distribution when wearing a tight ski boot.
Nociplastic pain is an unpleasant sensation and experience that results from an overly protective nervous system and distorted pain signal processing. Nociplastic pain is characterized by an upregulation of nociception, through a process of central sensitization that causes the nociceptors to fire in the absence of threatened or actual tissue damage or injury or disease of the nerves. Nociplastic pain remains fairly constant, not changing much with rest or movement. This type of pain can be heightened by stress, anxiety or difficult life circumstances.
Mrs W’s hip discomfort would fit best into the definition of nociceptive pain with underlying central sensitization because although it worsens with walking and standing on the left leg it has persisted beyond a normal healing time of 3 months. The pain has also become more persistent, occurring at a low level most of the time without any provocation. Given that Mrs W’s pain worsens with movement but can also be present at a persistent lower intensity, her experience seems to be a combination of nociceptive and nociplastic pain.
Meaningful Complaint
- Persistent left hip discomfort that worsens with walking more than 15 minutes
- Left leg unsteadiness with dressing the lower body and putting on shoes
Cognitive and Emotional Beliefs
Hip Unsteadiness: Mrs W previously did not think twice about standing on her left leg to get dressed and put shoes on. She felt very frustrated when her doctor told her she has a healthy hip and shouldn’t feel unsteady and she should be able to walk and dance no issue.
Hip Discomfort: Regarding her left hip discomfort, she put it down to her old car accident but it had become more disruptive to her walking since the recent fall.
Concussion: Mrs W felt that her concussion should be resolved by now based on what the emergency room doctor and her doctor had told her. She still noticed frequent head pressure, eye strain and trouble getting out to be social.
Mrs W expressed high motivation to get better as she is normally very active, walking five kilometers each day and salsa dancing three times per week. The experience of discomfort and unsteadiness with walking more than 15 minutes and standing on one leg without holding on was highly threatening to her sense of self. When asked about her greatest fear with regard to her meaningful complaints, Mrs W expressed a deep fear that her hip discomfort and unsteadiness would stop her from being active and cause her to have a hip replacement.
Diane’s question:
How will you modify your assessment to validate or negate these cognitive beliefs (old car accident and concussion)?
Susannah’s response:
When making corrections within the functional units, the physiotherapist can engage the patient in the process of comparing which correction of any region improves the experience of the meaningful task. This could be the hip or cranium or somewhere seemingly far and unrelated, such as the foot or the thorax. If the hip is the driver and therefore the most important place to intervene, correcting it should make the task feel easier. Because there is a more recent concussion layered on an old accident, there may be a co-driver relationship in which 2 areas require correction. Again this may or may not include the hip and the cranium and the correction will help the patient feel which area makes the change.
If Mrs W needed more reassurance around her hip area, a screen of the hip area could be completed. The drawback of such assessment can be revealing “red herring” findings that may or may not occur within a functional and task specific context. The hip may show up as a sensitive pain generating structure merely from being a poorly loaded victim area over time secondary to drivers elsewhere. In this case, the patient’s GP had done a physical exam of the hip and found everything to be normal. This is a case where a functional and task specific assessment is very relevant.
Meaningful Tasks
Walking and left one leg stance for putting on shoes.
Screening Tasks
- Standing screen
- Left one leg stance
Standing Screen
Findings for the Standing Screen
Functional unit 1: Pelvis, hips, and thorax to the third thoracic ring
Pelvis: Right transverse plane rotation (TPR) with a congruent right intra-pelvic torsion (IPT).
Hips: Left hip anterior, congruent with the right TPR at the pelvis; no anterior shear detected of the femoral head relative to the acetabulum.
Diane’s question:
You note the left hip is anterior, but not relative to the acetabulum, so what is it anterior to? Can you explain what you mean in this context when you use the words ‘congruent with the right TPR at the pelvis’?
Susannah’s response:
The left hip is anterior relative to the right hip. When the pelvis is right rotated in the transverse plane, the left hip will be further anterior than the right hip. This is the congruent position of the pelvis and hips and tells us the hips are well stacked under the pelvis, and biomechanically following the rotation of the pelvis. In this case, the hips and pelvis are in the same rotation to the right, which indicates the hip and pelvis, although rotated in the transverse plane, are going the same direction, making a vector of restriction unlikely between these two areas.
Thorax:
3rd and 5th thoracic rings (TR) left translated/right rotated
4th thoracic ring right translated/left rotated
8th thoracic ring left translated/right rotated
Incongruencies:
The 3rd, 5th and 8th thoracic rings are congruent with each other and with the pelvis and hip, but incongruent with the “sandwiched” 4th thoracic ring.
Diane’s comment and question:
Well said! Now then, the word ‘congruent’ is used here in a different context than its use above. How is it different?
Susannah’s response:
In this context, congruent refers to parts of a functional unit that are working together biomechanically, meaning that each segment of the functional unit moves with optimal biomechanics for the task. In this case, for the task of standing, the 4th thoracic ring is inconsistent with the thorax, pelvis and hips.
Diane’s further comment:
And for clarity, ‘working together biomechanically’ does not necessarily mean ‘moving in the same direction’. The task may require that segments move in opposite directions for the task, therefore congruent in this instance means that the biomechanics are appropriate for the task, as opposed to simply rotating in the same direction.
Functional unit 2: Second thoracic ring to cranium
Thorax:
TR2 Infinity sign
TR1 Left Rotated
Diane’s question:
The infinity sign is likely a new term for many physiotherapists not trained in ISM. We will get into hypotheses of mechanisms underpinning this finding later, for now can you describe what the findings were at TR2 that led to this labeling?
Susannah’s response:
At the second thoracic ring there was no static or consistent position of the ring. When palpated from the front, the second thoracic ring began in a right translated/left rotated position and gradually moved into a left translated/right rotated position. The second ring then continued back into right translation/left rotation and so on. This alternating rotation was monitored for up to 30 seconds, over several cycles to confirm this finding. If only a quick check of the second thoracic ring is done the infinity sign can be missed completely. While monitoring the second ring, the relative amplitude of left and right rotation was noted. In some cases, a partial infinity sign is present in which there is a partial rotation of the ring to one side and a complete rotation to the other. The partial infinity can result from neural, myofascial or visceral vectors holding the thoracic ring more firmly on the side of lesser amplitude.
Diane’s further question:
Did you find a complete infinity sign or a partial one? What is the difference in the finding (no reasoning yet)?
Susannah’s response:
In this case, a complete infinity sign was detected as the relative amplitude of left and right rotation was equal. In the case of a partial infinity sign, the thoracic ring has a greater amplitude of rotation to one side.
Diane’s response:
Excellent description of a partial vs complete infinity sign.
Shoulder girdles:
Left TPR as determined by the position of the clavicles
Right scapula downwardly rotated, while the left was in slight upward rotation
Right clavicle elevated and anteriorly rotated relative to the left
Humeral heads were centered in the glenoid fossas
Neck:
C7 left translated/right rotated
C6 to C2 right translated/left rotated
Cranial region:
C1 in left rotation
Paradoxical motion of the temporal bones (walking cranium) present
Diane’s question:
Can you describe this paradoxical motion of the temporal bones that led to the term ‘walking cranium’?
Susannah’s response:
In the flexion phase of the cranial rhythm, the cranium widens in the transverse plane and narrows in the sagittal plane. In the extension phase, the cranium narrows in the transverse plane and widens in the sagittal plane.
Each bone of the cranial vault has a specific movement during these phases of the cranial rhythm. The temporal bones in the flexion phase rotate anteriorly, and the mastoids move posterior-medially. There is also a slight outward motion of the squamous portion of the bone in this phase, due to the location of the axis of motion being approximately through the petrous portion of the temporal bone. During the extension phase, the temporal bones rotate posteriorly, the mastoids move anterior-lateral and the squamous portion of the temporal bone moves inwards.
The term ‘walking cranium’ refers to the paradoxical motion of the cranium that is detected in ISM by palpating the motion of the temporal bones. Normally, the left and right temporal bones move synchronously in the same direction with the same amplitude of motion. When asynchrony of the flexion and extension phases is present between the right and left sides, one temporal bone is anteriorly rotated, while the other is posteriorly rotated. A ‘walking cranium’ does not refer to cases in which there is no, or significantly reduced, cranial rhythm on one side. In this case there is often a musculoskeletal restriction that needs to be treated, similar to the partial infinity sign.
Diane’s comment:
And I would add that the entire cranium (left and right side) is moving, not just the temporal bones, and that their flexion/extension phases are not synchronized and symmetric. We assess this rhythm, in part, by palpating the temporal bones.
Incongruencies:
The findings of a walking cranium and TR2 infinity sign are incongruent with the other findings. In FU#2, C7 and C1 are incongruent with C2 to C6 and TR1
Functional unit 3: Lower Extremities
Feet:
The right hindfoot, midfoot and forefoot were in pronation as indicated by a lateral rotation of the calcaneus relative to the talus. The talus was plantarflexed and adducted relative to the calcaneus. The left foot was also in pronation.
Diane’s question:
Considering the R TPR of the pelvis, what is the expected, congruent pattern of position of the right and left foot?
Susannah’s response:
When the pelvis is in a right TPR, a congruent position for the feet would be a supinated right hindfoot with the talus laterally rotated in relation to the calcaneus. In this position the talus is abducted and dorsiflexed in relation to the calcaneus. The left hindfoot would be expected to rest in pronation, in which the talus is plantarflexed and adducted relative to the calcaneus, and the calcaneus laterally rotated relative to the talus. A neutral left foot would not be expected in this case given the rotation of the pelvis. The right hindfoot, in this case, should be supinated.
Knees:
The right knee was in slight valgus. The left knee was neutral relative to the left foot and left hip.
The standing screen provides the baseline findings on which changes can be determined for the screening tasks that are related components of the meaningful task. In this case, some of the findings, including a walking cranium and infinity sign at the second thoracic ring, already suggest a dural system impairment is present. These findings indicate that there is no stable position of TR2 or the cranium. In one phase of the cranial rhythm, the congruent pattern is present but in the opposite phase the findings are incongruent.
Diane’s question:
Can you describe what you mean by ‘stable’ in the paragraph above?
Susannah’s response:
On palpation of the temporal bones, no consistent position of the posterior neurocranium was detected. Instead, it was determined that a similar fluctuation to that found at the level of the second thoracic ring was present; this is referred to in ISM as a walking cranium because the right temporal bone moves from anterior to posterior rotation while the left temporal bone moves from posterior rotation to anterior. This rhythm continues in this out of sync matter until synchronicity is restored. This can happen spontaneously if the body self-corrects, or it can be treated with the help of a person trained in cranial techniques.
Diane’s question:
A driver is a skeletal region of the body; therefore the dura cannot be a driver as it is not part of the skeletal system. The dura and epineurium can be the impairment that is so-called ‘driving’ the alignment changes in the skeleton but the impact of adverse mobility of the cranial and spinal dura is not confined to one region of the skeleton. What are some known hypotheses of what causes the cranium to ‘walk’ or the TR2 to present with an ‘infinity sign’ as you have described in a previous question?
Susannah’s response:
The infinity sign occurs from an imbalance in the cranial rhythm between its extension and flexion phases. It is hypothesized to be the body’s way of trying to restore the normal cranial rhythm; however, there is very little to be found on where this sign originates from, even in the osteopathic literature.
The cranial rhythm is present throughout the body and is theorized to occur from the production and distribution of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) through the ventricles and cisterns that distribute CSF within the central nervous system. In the flexion phase, the ventricles widen and fill as CSF is produced. During the extension phase the CSF production stops and ventricles narrow as they empty through the ventricles and cisterns. The cranium, torso and the extremities follow this pattern of subtle lateral widening in the flexion phase and narrowing in the extension phase. In the extremities the flexion phase produces an external rotation of the limb, and an internal rotation in extension phase.
An imbalance in the cranial rhythm that produces a walking cranium and/or infinity sign could occur from an acute pressure change to the system such as a rapid acceleration/deceleration injury from a fall, car or sporting accident. Sudden, or persistent, emotional stressors or trauma could also cause an acute or chronic pressure change. This occurs through the nervous system’s modulation of the vascular systems, which subsequently the dural sinuses and Batson’s plexus. The combination of both physical and emotional trauma can produce this sign in some people and the physical and emotional aspects of trauma are inseparable.
It has been proposed by George Stylian, an osteopathic physician in Australia, that the complete walking cranium, or the manubrial or pelvic infinity sign, where the amplitude of flexion and extension phases is the same on the left and right sides but occurring out of sync, results from a restriction in the midline of the body such as at the sphenobasilar symphysis or manubriosternal symphysis. Partial cases, in which one side has a larger movement than the other, are often associated with a unilateral dural, articular, neuromuscular, myofascial or visceral vector and normal CSF flow. The cases with partial walking or infinity signs respond well to treatment of the musculoskeletal system as in finding drivers first, and releasing the relevant vectors restricting either the flexion or extension phase of the body’s rhythm.
The persistent infinity sign, or walking cranium, could reflect a system that is out of balance from a rapid pressure change and is trying to restore its homeostasis but has not yet self-corrected. The infinity sign and walking cranium can occur together or separately. The infinity sign in the thorax may be more specific to a pressure change within the thorax area or in response to the asymmetric tension forces from the deep cervical and intrathoracic fascial systems. There is no direct dural attachment to the second thoracic ring.
Diane’s question:
If adverse mobility of the intra-cranial dura and its continuation into the spinal dura is the predominant system impairment, do you expect to find a musculoskeletal driver in the screening tasks and if not, why not?
Susannah’s response:
An impaired dural system has adverse mobility which is proposed to occur from the slack in the dural system being taken up by excessive fluid retained in the venous plexi, including the dural sinuses and Batson’s plexus. The end result is tension in the dura at rest, that subsequently has an adverse effect on skeletal mobility. In a non-impaired dural system the dural layers have sufficient slack, meaning they are able to bunch up, as well as flatten out. In this context extensibility refers to the dural layers having sufficient slack to allow the other body systems to move freely. When adverse cranial or spinal dural or epineural mobility as a whole is the main impairment, the system prevents movement of the skeleton that requires elongation of the dura/epineurium.
The musculoskeletal system attempts to accommodate changes in dural and epineural mobility by altering the alignment in ways that shorten the hard frame. If musculoskeletal corrections are applied, it will be found that correcting one region of the skeletal system results in worse alignment of another skeletal region as the dura lacks sufficient extensibility. There will be no driver, or combination of drivers that improve other sites of impairment or the patient’s experience, because somewhere else will be compressed to accommodate for adverse dura mobility. For all of the reasons described above no musculoskeletal driver was expected in this case.
Also, a note on the term “shortening” as it pertains to the dura: adverse dural and epineural system mobility is not a true shortening of these systems as it sometimes is described. The dural system contains no elastin as contractile tissues do. This means the dural system has no inherent ability to shorten or lengthen but rather gets congested with fluid that takes up the slack and impacts the extensibility of the system. This is an important distinction as it impacts how treatment of this impairment is approached, plus how the effects of such treatment are understood and explained to patients.
Diane’s comment:
Well described Susannah!
Left one leg stance (OLS)
Findings for left one leg stance (OLS)
Functional unit 1: Pelvis, hips, and thorax to the third thoracic ring
Pelvis:
R TPR; the left SIJ unlocked at approximately 75% of left OLS
Hips:
L hip anterior to R; no anterior shear
Thorax:
3rd and 5th thoracic rings left translated/right rotated
4th thoracic ring right translated/left rotated
8th thoracic ring worsened into a right translation/left rotation
Incongruencies:
The left SIJ unlock is incongruent. The pelvis and left hip were incongruent with TR4 and 8.
Diane’s question:
Refer back to your two definitions provided with respect to the word congruent (or incongruent) and then tell me what the left SIJ unlock is incongruent with and which definition applies to this statement.
Susannah’s revised response:
An unlocking SIJ is incongruent with the required biomechanics for transferring loads through the weight bearing pelvis. The use of the word ‘incongruent’ in this case applies to the second definition since an sacroiliac joint unlocking in one leg stance is suboptimal biomechanics for the task. The left side of the sacrum should remain nutated relative to the left innominate as weight is transferred over the leg.
Functional Unit 1 Driver for left OLS
The pelvis correction gave the best result compared to the hip and thorax corrections as it resulted in a later unlock of the L SIJ leading to partial improvement of L hip alignment and lessened the translation/rotation of TR4 and TR8. However, this correction did not change the experience of the one leg stance task; therefore, no driver was present in this unit.
Diane’s comment and question:
A proper pelvic correction should not result in ANY unlocking of the SIJ, that is part of the correction. If you only correct the TPR and don’t force close the pelvis, this is an incomplete correction and the motor control strategy for alignment of the thorax and/or hip will not completely change if the pelvis is truly the driver since the correction is incomplete. What was the impact of a three thoracic ring correction of TR3, 4 & 5 on TR8? What was the impact of a 3 ring correction (TR3, 4, 5) and TR8 in combination if one didn’t correct the other, on the right hip and the control of the left SIJ?
These test findings are necessary to truly support the pelvis MAY be your driver here since from your report the pelvic correction was incomplete. What was her experience with the partial pelvic correction? When the dura is the underlying system impairment, alignment and biomechanics in other sites of impairment may improve but that is not all that is required to determine that a musculoskeletal region is a driver, a required region for directing treatment.
Susannah’s response:
When correcting the pelvis, the TPR was corrected and the pelvis was force closed, however the correction became difficult to maintain and was felt to pull apart slightly once in left OLS. This may have happened as the thorax was unable to center well over the pelvis when standing on the left leg. In comparison, correction of the thorax gave a slight improvement within the thorax itself but did not change the pelvis. The thorax correction worsened the left hip.
Diane’s comment:
This scenario is very typical of a dural system impairment which resists the combined correction of multiple regions of the skeletal system since the skeletal system is adapting to the needs of the dura.
Functional unit 2: Second thoracic ring to cranium
Thorax:
No change from standing screen
Shoulder girdle:
No change from standing screen
Neck:
C7 moved further into left translation/right rotation
C2 moved further into right rotation/left translation
Cranial region: No change from standing screen
Incongruencies:
C7 became further incongruent with the shoulder girdle and cranial region
Functional Unit 2 Driver for left OLS
No driver
Correcting the cranium resulted in slightly better centering over the left leg and slightly easier weight shifting; however, no change in the cervical spine or upper rings occurred and Mrs W felt no meaningful change in the experience of the task. Based on this, no musculoskeletal driver was present in functional unit 2.
Functional unit 3: Left lower extremity
L foot:
Remained neutral; the tibia was in slight ER relative to the femur in standing
L knee:
Remained neutral with a normal screw home mechanism
Incongruencies:
None
Functional Unit 3 Driver for left OLS
No driver identified relevant to the task in functional unit 3. Although there were some interesting findings around the right foot, the right foot is up off the ground in this task. The alignment of the left lower extremity from the hip down with single leg loading was unremarkable.
Summary of Functional Unit Drivers for left OLS
Functional Unit 1 – No driver
Functional Unit 2 – No driver
Functional Unit 3 – No driver
Overall driver for left one leg stance: No driver
Explanation
- Correction of the L hip worsened the pelvis and thorax. The patient’s experience worsened.
- Correction of the pelvis improved the pelvis only and did not change the thorax. The patient’s experience did not change.
- Correction of the upper thorax improved the lower and upper thorax slightly but worsened the hip and the neck. The patient’s experience did not change.
- Correction of the first ring and cervical spine segments improved only the corrected segments.
- The cranium correction was most effective at improving centering over the left leg; however, this did not change the experience of the meaningful task for Mrs W.
Clinical reasoning
- The presence of a walking cranium and infinity sign at the second thoracic ring, combined with the patient’s history of a traumatic accident in which she still reports feeling on edge every time she goes for a walk suggest that the primary system impairment is the dural system.
- At this point, further assessment of this system is required to understand the extent of adverse dural mobility.
Further Assessment of the Dural/Epineural System
In order to arrive at an accurate assessment of mobility of the cranial dura, the walking cranium first required attention. Resynchronization of the left and right sides of the cranium was done in supine by holding the right temporal bone in posterior rotation and allowing the left temporal bone to catch up to the position of the right temporal as it transitioned into posterior rotation. The symmetrical movement of the two bones was then manually facilitated and followed for several phases to ensure balance and entrainment of the rhythm. This was confirmed by checking both the cranium and the second thoracic ring position to see if a walking cranium and/or an infinity sign recurred/persisted, and it did not. TR2 was now consistently in a left rotated/right translated position, with a congruent manubrium. This ensured good drainage of the venous system through the upper thorax. When this all was completed, the cranium was in a consistent, but incongruent left ICT with a R rotated sphenoid.
Next, intra-cranial dural mobility (cerebral falx and cerebellar tentorium) was assessed followed by an assessment of the intra-spinal dural mobility. The sphenoid and ICT were co-corrected manually and passive listening on the release of this correction revealed a vector of pull from the right anterior part of the cerebellar tentorium. It should be noted that correction of the right side was difficult and the perception was of a short hard articular restriction, one area being the sphenotemporal suture and the other being the craniofacial junction.
Diane’s question:
How do you hypothesize these vectors were created?
Susannah’s response:
I hypothesize that these vectors came from Mrs W’s fall forwards striking the right orbital region.
The spinal dural extensibility was assessed by holding the cranium corrected while a diaphragmatic breath, a contraction of the pelvic floor muscles and a straight leg raise were instructed. In this case, the tension on the spinal dura created a caudal pull on the sphenoid with both the diaphragmatic breath and the pelvic floor contraction. This suggests the spinal dura as the next place to treat with manual therapy and exercises to encourage extensibility of the dural system, once the cranial dura was released. Other dural tests, such as the slump and upper limb tension tests, were not performed as they were not specific to the meaningful task of walking, but may be useful at a later time to understand the full extent of the dural involvement. Further dural assessment tests using Barral methods were used to confirm the findings of this ISM assessment.
Hypothesis
Dural system impairment secondary to an upregulated sympathetic nervous system.
Mrs. W presented with a dural system impairment in both the spinal and cranial regions. From working with the patient it became clear that the dura did not have adequate extensibility, which became more obvious as she stood on her left leg. Correction of the infinity sign did not last between the first and second sessions and the whole dural system felt to be under tension. Upregulation of the autonomic nervous system is hard to measure subjectively, but in hindsight using an objective measure such as HRV could have been useful.
Diane’s comment:
Susannah has noted an important correlation here between the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and this dural system impairment. The sympathetic nervous system regulates the vascular system and when upregulated the veins can become congested. This is one mechanism that can produce, and explain, dural tension (Barral). Since the SNS often underpins the dural mobility impairment, any improvement that occurs with drainage of these veins (releasing the dura), without addressing the underlying cause (physical, psychological, social) of the upregulation of the SNS, will be temporary at best.
Mrs W was hit as a pedestrian at 16 years old and had a pelvic surgery in her 30s. Overall, her body compensated well and allowed her to be active, although hypervigilant when out walking. After the fall on ice in 2021, she did not recover completely and this failure to recover has been very distressing for her. When starting from a clean slate our body is very good at compensating and adapting to changes that result from injury and fall. As more injuries, surgeries, infections occur, the adaptability of the body is reduced. For some, this reduced capacity to adapt can become threatening to the nervous system. For this patient, there was a persistent threat of being hit by a car and perseveration on the hip being damaged and requiring hip replacement.
According to Porges Polyvagal theory, there are three states available to the ANS when faced with threat; the social engagement state (ventral vagal), the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) state and the dorsal vagal (DV) state. These states are not in conscious awareness; rather they occur automatically. In health, an individual should be anchored in the ventral vagal state; one of safety and connection. From this anchored state, the ANS can move into and out of the SNS or DV states throughout the day. As long as they can return to the safe ventral state quickly, there is no persistent stress, or threat. In response to threat, the social engagement, or ventral vagal system is activated first. This low level phase uses non-verbal cues of neuroception inside and outside the body (listening to tone of voice, posture, gestures, context of experience, feedback from the gut) to determine if the situation is safe. If the situation is determined by the ANS to be unsafe, the next survival state is engaged; and the sympathetic nervous system responds. This is a state associated with doing things; fighting or running away, and is key to our survival. In fight or flight the person prepares to deal directly with a threat by putting up a defense of some form or by leaving the situation. Note that this phase should be short term as is very stressful both psychologically and physiologically to maintain this level of activation. When the threat level is very high, or there is no activity (flight or fight) possible, the dorsal vagal state can arrive. Here, the person withdraws, disconnects, or dissociates, from the situation as this minimizes suffering in the face of severe, sometimes life threatening danger.
Recurrent, or persistent, upregulation of the sympathetic nervous system contributes to overall tension in the dura and pressure type headaches, secondary to the impact of the SNS on the vascular system. Mrs W reported the pressure in her head as general in its distribution, versus being localized behind the right eye. The nerves of the sympathetic nervous system innervate the nerves and blood vessels around the dural layers. With increased tone in these blood vessels over time there is increased venous congestion between the layers of the dura. It becomes as though the nervous system, which is coated by the dura and supplied by its veins and nerves is a size too small for the body. This pushes the blood into the lower pressure, higher volume venous system close to the dura known as Batson’s plexus and into the venous plexus around the brain. This is where the backflow of blood pools when there is high sympathetic tone in the arterial blood vessels and this contributes to pressure symptoms and achy pain. Batson’s plexus relates closely with the pelvic and hip area and congestion here could explain some of the discomfort that the patient experiences. Congestion around the dural layers causes the dura to extend, or expand, horizontally. This means there is less capacity in the dura for extensibility. It becomes much harder for the dura to slide and glide longitudinally with daily movement. The discomfort Mrs W experienced could result from an interplay of excessive venous congestion that can’t clear because of sympathetically driven vasoconstriction, the nerves that innervate the dura, and/or the resultant compression of the musculoskeletal system.
The dura is not a stretchy membrane but rather maintains consistent length and is a reciprocal tension membrane. To understand reciprocal tension, imagine someone pulling on the right bottom corner of your T-shirt; the pull will also be felt at your left shoulder and perhaps your right shoulder or left hip. Where the reciprocal tension travels depends on the magnitude of the pull as well as its direction. The dura has a complex structure as its layers form the intricate wrapping around the brain and spinal cord and the sleeves of the peripheral nerves. This means that the area of symptoms can vary depending on the task and the areas that lack extensibility. Symptoms that stem from a dural system impairment can be incredibly frustrating for patients and practitioners unfamiliar with the impairment. Dural system impairment symptoms do have a pattern of staying in the spine or cranium, but often change location and can be very hard to reproduce in the clinic. In Mrs W’s case her hip discomfort is always there to some degree but worsens when walking over 15 minutes. She mentioned that walking slower could temporarily lessen the discomfort. This makes sense given that dural symptoms come on more prominently when this system is pushed beyond its capabilities even outside of the brain and spinal cord area.
Mrs W had tried to be active but the more she tried, the more discomfort she got, leading her to be fearful of a permanent loss of function. This appeared to be a vicious cycle of upregulation, leading to less function and more upregulation over time. When there is overall dural tension due to sympathetic nervous system upregulation there is often a feeling of being ungrounded in the environment and there is a lack of reference points as the thorax, cranium and sometimes pelvis are fluctuating with the out of sync cranial rhythm. Mrs W had great difficulty giving feedback and feeling a change in her body with any of the ISM corrections.
Diane’s comment:
One of the classic features of a dural system mobility impairment is that no change in alignment or control of any MSK body region impacts performance experience, as you have reported previously. The purpose of ‘finding a driver’ is to further assess that body region to determine the underlying impairment that requires treatment. The infinity sign, walking cranium and her history are enough to abandon ‘finding drivers’ because these signs direct assessment to the dural system and its extension into the epineural system, either into the pelvic floor, the upper or lower extremity. Sometimes, once the dural mobility has been restored, MSK drivers appear as they pertain to a screening task relative to a meaningful task. It is not uncommon to be switching from the two types of assessment/treatment (dura/epineurium vs MSK driver) between, or within, treatment sessions. With a persistent upregulated SNS, consideration should be given to any underlying unresolved trauma experience.
Treatment
The walking cranium was addressed earlier in the assessment section. The motion of the cranial bones was briefly followed for several cycles to ensure the paradoxical movement was resolved.
As noted earlier in the assessment section, the correct, release and listen technique in the cranium revealed a listening at the anterior cerebellar tentorium that attaches at the superior clinoid process. This suggests reduced extensibility and drainage at this part of the cerebellar tentorium. There also was a hard short listening at the right sphenotemporal suture, suggesting an articular restriction of this suture. This part of the cranium was very hard to decompress. This suture would need to be treated first in order to get a good result with the anterior tentorium technique.
Release of the sphenotemporal suture was completed first, followed with the anterior cerebellar tentorium drainage technique. To facilitate overall drainage of the cranium, the posterior cerebellar tentorium on the right and left sides were treated to decongest the venous sinuses using the V-spread technique. The correct, release and listen technique at the cranium was repeated and the overall movement of the cerebellar tentorium had improved. There remained; however, a feeling of anterior restriction in the cranium, not in the posterior neurocranium, but in the facial area of the viscerocranium. The area between the neurocranium and viscerocranium is referred to in the Barral teachings as the craniofacial junction. This junction is formed posteriorly by the frontal, temporal and sphenoid bones of the cranial vault and anteriorly by the maxilla, ethmoid, vomer, nasal and zygomatic bones. There can be an articular restriction along this junction that can interfere with the intracranial pressure and venous drainage, along with adverse neural mobility in the cranial nerves. Barral listening at the cranium was used to triangulate findings. A technique with finger placement at the maxilla inside the oral cavity and at the zygomatic process of the frontal bone to decompress the craniofacial junction. The goal of this technique was to improve movement at this articulation between the neurocranium and viscerocranium and on reassessment this was improved.
The spinal dura was treated next by anchoring the C0-C2 dural attachments and the caudal dural attachment at S2 to facilitate venous drainage from cranium to sacrum. Once completed, the cranium rested in a left ICT with a congruent left rotated sphenoid. Following this, several Barral nerve plexi and phrenic nerve techniques were used in the thoracic and abdominal region to reduce sympathetic outflow.
Sympathetic nervous system upregulation was determined to be an important part of this story. As such, diaphragmatic breathing was taught in the first session. Breathing exercises are an accessible and effective way to intervene in the autonomic nervous system. The autonomic nervous system has opposing two branches: the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems. The sympathetic nervous system, often referred to as the fight or flight system, increases breathing rate, heart rate, and systolic blood pressure through vasoconstriction of the arterial system. Digestion and bodily functions are suppressed, pupils constrict, and the visual field narrows to focus in on the threat. In a situation of acute threat, this pushes blood to the muscles and away from the organs to allow us to act fast and hopefully survive the situation. There is a third sympathetic response referred to as freeze. This occurs when the threat is deemed to be too large to fight or flee or there is no way of escaping. The bodily response is to stop and essentially play dead. The sympathetic arousal promotes decreased sensation of pain. Deployed in the right situation and in the short term sympathetic responses are helpful, but they are detrimental to the health and homeostasis of the body in the long term.
Diane’s question:
Before, you stated that the freeze response was in relationship to the parasympathetic dorsal vagal system (Porge’s Polyvagal Theory). Here, you state that the freeze response is a third sympathetic response. Can you clarify the difference please?
Susannah’s response:
Great question! The traditional view of the ANS is that the SNS and PNS are the two main divisions. Dr Steven Porges proposed a further division of the PNS in 1994 in which dorsal and ventral branches of the vagus nerve produce different PNS responses. The vagus nerve is the main input of the parasympathetic nerve system and two distinct parasympathetic responses are possible under Porge’s Polyvagal theory. The Ventral Vagal response supports social engagement. The Dorsal Vagal response as described by Porges, immobilizes us and pulls us away from social engagement by producing a freeze immobilization response. This can take the form of rest and digest or can be a defensive shutdown response. There is newer discussion that these states can be “blended states” as described by Deb Dana. According to Dana, the PNS dorsal vagal state can be paired with an SNS activation that produces another type of “freeze” response. This is an anxious/hypervigilant immobilization of the body versus the previously mentioned PNS dorsal vagal response. Mrs W seems to have been in an anxious SNS type freeze response but this was likely alternated with a PNS dorsal vagal response based on the circumstances.
Diane’s comment:
There is so much more we could go into here! For the reader, please look up Porge’s Polyvagal Theory and Deb Dana’s Befriending the Nervous System podcast or the book Anchored for further information.
With regard to the dural and epineural systems, having chronic vasoconstriction of the arterial system pushes more blood into the venous plexus and cisterns around the brain and spine. In the acute case, the muscles are in use for fight or flight and we need the arterial constriction to move the blood to the contractile tissue. In long term sympathetic nervous system activation, the muscles are not active to the same degree as in an acute threat. Such long term activation becomes very fatiguing, neurally and hormonally to a system that is not switching into the necessary recovery state of the parasympathetic nervous system.
The parasympathetic nervous system facilitates rest and digest recovery responses; its activation lowers resting heart rate, breathing rate and systolic blood pressure. From a dural congestion perspective it allows the venous system to hold less of the blood by promoting vasodilation of the arterial system.
Breathing was taught as a focused 3 second inhale into the lower rib rage versus into the upper chest and prolonging the exhale for at least 6 seconds the parasympathetic (rest and digest) branch of the autonomic nervous system is activated and the sympathetic fight and flight responses are deactivated. The diaphragm rests at the level of the 7th rib in its highest position at the end of an exhale and has its attachments via the crus down to L1,L2,L3 and ribs 7-12. The crura are formed by the median arcuate ligaments and from an arch for the aorta, azygos vein, thoracic lymphatic duct. Good activation of the lateral movement of the diaphragm promotes both lymphatic and venous return which aids in reducing congestion around the dura.
Home exercise, education and referral:
- Inhale to hum when feeling overwhelmed in a social setting or at work. A long exhale and hum combination increases parasympathetic drive.
- A daily breathing practice consisting of 10 minutes per day of long exhale diaphragmatic breathing. Mrs. W was instructed to inhale for 3 seconds and exhale for 6 seconds. This could be done in isolation or as part of a meditation practice.
- Referral to a counselor who specializes in the integration of trauma was provided after discussion with Mrs W regarding her perceived stress level, supports and coping strategies.
- Self-dural drainage three times per day using distraction of the temporal bones, combined with lateral costal breath for 2 minutes, then with contraction of the pelvic floor.
The self-dural drainage technique is intended to facilitate decongestion of the dural system. By distracting gently at the temporal bones the layers of the tentorium are gently stretched which encourages fluid between these layers to clear.
The lateral costal breathing and pelvic floor contractions both use muscular diaphragms to provide a vertical extension to the spinal dura. Diane Lee has often compared draining the spinal dura to a cake decorator with holes in the side as this is a helpful analogy. The cake decorator maintains its same length but gets wider as it’s filled with icing. When icing a cake the decorator is gently squeezed and elongated to allow the icing to come out and the decorator narrows as it slackens and empties.
The diaphragm lies close to the thoracic narrowing of the spinal dura at T8-9. This narrowing at T8-9 is a common site of dural congestion and has a common pattern of achy persistent pain between the shoulder blades. The pelvic floor is the lower muscular diaphragm and dural congestion in this area can refer to the hips, pelvis and lower back regions.
First Followup Session
At the next session, the TR2 infinity sign and walking cranium had returned. This was again resynchronized as described above until the cranial rhythm was symmetrical and had a smooth quality with normal amplitude and rate of 8-16 cycles/minute. The patient reported less unsteadiness when standing on her left leg to put on her shoe and dress her lower body, but walking more than 15 minutes was still difficult.
Diane’s question:
There are many mechanisms at play here that could explain her unsteadiness in left OLS. Were you able to determine if the unsteadiness was directly related to this infinity sign/walking cranium? In other words, even though the restoration of optimal synchronous rhythm could be restored, was the unsteadiness related when it was not?
Susannah’s response:
When the infinity sign and walking cranium were corrected there was little unsteadiness when Mrs W was standing on her left leg.
Prior to treating the peripheral dura, the cranial dura must be moving well. The cranium was checked for any persisting vectors with the correct, release and listen technique at the mastoid processes and the greater wings of sphenoid. The posterior cerebellar tentorium on the right side pulled in early and strongly compared to the left side. The right posterior cerebellar tentorium was again treated with the V-spread technique. The extensibility of the spinal dura was checked by palpating the upper spinal dura attachmen. Mrs W then performed a lateral costal breath, a contraction of the pelvic floor muscles, extension of her leg and finally a straight leg raise. When an increase in tension was felt at the upper spinal dural attachment of C0-C2 this was noted. In this case, tension was greatest between the upper dural attachment and the tailbone.
This session focused on the remaining spinal dural tension by anchoring the dura at the occiput and the tailbone. Pelvic floor contractions were then performed while the spinal dura was anchored to tension the lower dural attachment and facilitate drainage in Batson’s venous plexus in the spinal canal. As these were completed, less pull at the level of the spinal dura was felt at the upper dural attachment at the base of the occiput. After draining Batson’s plexus surrounding the spinal canal, contraction and relaxation of the pelvic floor and the straight leg raise test did not result in an inferior pull through the cranium.
Second Followup Session
This session returned to assess the standing screen and left OLS and determine if a musculoskeletal driver was now present.
Standing screen and changes with L OLS
FU#1
Pelvis:
R TPR/R IPT in standing, left SIJ unlocked in LOLS and pelvis stayed in a R TPR
Thorax:
TR3 R rotated/L translated – moves into L rotation/R translation in L OLS
TR4 L rotated/L translated – remains the same in L OLS
TR 5 R rotated/L translated – moves into L rotation/R translation in L OLS
TR8 R rotated/L translated – mains the same in L OLS
Hips:
L hip anterior relative to the pelvis; no anterior shear
FU#1 Driver
Primary driver: Pelvis – The pelvis correction allowed for near complete stacking of the thorax over the pelvis in L OLS. The upper thoracic ring sandwich at TR3, 4, 5 improved but did not fully correct. In L OLS, the pelvis correction improved the thorax but the sandwiched 4th thoracic ring remained the same.
Secondary driver: Thorax – Adding a correction specific to the sandwiched 4th thoracic ring in the thorax allowed improved alignment of the other units and improved the experience of the task, however the 4th thoracic ring did not fully correct.
FU#2
Completing a head-neck (HN) rotation screen with the FU #1 drivers corrected did not change HN rotation, therefore FU #2 was not assessed further.
FU#3
The left foot was pronated as indicated by a laterally rotated calcaneus relative to the talus. The talus was adducted and plantarflexed relative to the calcaneus.
Final drivers for L OLS screening task
Primary driver: Pelvis
Secondary driver: Thorax
Diane’s question:
A really important finding for determining a MSK driver is the patient’s experience. What was the impact of correcting the pelvis and thorax on:
- Her sense of unsteadiness/balance during the left OLS and putting a right shoe on?
- Her hip pain?
Susannah’s response:
The pelvis and thorax corrections improved Mrs W’s sense of being steady on her leg as she would stand when putting her right shoe on and improved her hip pain.
Diane’s comment:
Previously, you noted that her unsteadiness was in relationship to the asynchronous cranial rhythm. Here, you note the further improvement in her balance was attained by improving the alignment of her thorax and pelvis. This is a common presentation when both a dural system impairment and MSK drivers are responsible for task performance.
Further Assessment of the Pelvis
Active mobility
With the L SIJ assessed in open chain standing on the R leg and lifting the L knee, the L innominate had no posterior rotation relative to sacrum. The R innominate in comparison had full posterior rotation of the right innominate relative to the sacrum when R SIJ active mobility was checked.
Active control
The left SIJ unlocks in left OLS at 90% weight bearing.
Passive mobility
The upper and middle parts of the L SIJ were not able to glide in the plane of the joint when compared to the R SIJ. With the load, release and listen technique at the middle pole of the L SIJ the listening took the hand slightly to the left of the midline of the pelvis anteriorly. The upper pole when released took the perception up the back and side of the trunk. The middle pole restriction felt the strongest and was a broad, superficial pull that took the hand to roughly 50% depth and just left of center into the pelvis. The left anterior pelvis area was gently drawn to the left side and held by the patient, while the L SIJ was re-checked. This correction improved the passive mobility of the left sacroiliac joint. A visceral vector was found in the anterior left side of the pelvis and this was treated with visceral manipulation (Barral).
After release of this visceral vector, passive mobility testing was repeated at the SIJs and there was the same amount of movement at the middle pole on the right and left sides. The upper pole of the left SIJ still had less movement and listening during release of the loading took the hand’s perception up the left side of the trunk. Slackening the left iliocostalis and internal oblique improved the glide at the upper pole. To treat this, a release with awareness technique for the left iliocostalis and internal oblique was used. Lateral costal breathing was given to assist in keeping the obliques relaxed and to begin awareness of holding the thorax in a stacked position without compressing into the upper ribs.
Passive control
Normal on both sides
Findings post release
When re-checked in supine, passive mobility was normal indicating the neural and visceral vectors had been addressed. When re-assessed in standing active control was restored. This means that no specific up-training of the lumbo-sacral regions of the deep fibers of multifidus or transverse abdominis was required.
Further Assessment of the Thorax
Active mobility
Active mobility of the thorax was reduced in both right rotation and flexion, essential biomechanics for both walking and bending forward to put on a sock or shoe. The rotational movement stopped quite early in the range, suggesting the thoracic ring interfering with movement was higher up.
Active control
Not tested at this time as vectors of restriction were present.
Passive mobility
In standing TR4 was very difficult to correct to neutral or into right rotation (required for walking) and an articular system impairment was suspected. Thus, TR4 and its articulations were assessed for articular restrictions. Articular restrictions at the right superior TR4 zygapophyseal joint were treated with a sustained Gr 4 mobilization first.
Diane’s question:
Let’s get specific! The inability to correct TR4 (rotate out of left rotation to neutral and into right rotation) led you to suspect an articular system restriction. What are the possible joints and direction of glide restriction (superior or inferior) could be responsible? There are four.
Susannah’s response:
In this case the first two joints to test would be the superior glide of the L T3-4 zygapophyseal and the inferior glide of the R T3-4 zygapophyseal joint. At the costotransverse joints (CTVJ) the L superior glide with an anterior roll would be checked, along with the ability of the R CTVJ to glide inferiorly and roll posteriorly.
Diane’s comment:
So based on your passive findings noted above, I am assuming that only one joint was restricted, the right zygapophyseal joint at T3-4 and the restriction was an inferior glide.
Passive control
Not tested initially due to articular vectors of restriction.
Active control after release of restrictive vectors
After release of the articular restriction at T3-4, active control was retested and control of the 4th thoracic ring was lacking when loaded.
Summary of RACM Treatment
The ISM treatment protocol of RACM – Release, Align, Connect, Move was followed.
Release
Pelvis: L pelvic visceral vector, L iliocostalis and internal oblique
Thorax: T3-4 R zygapophyseal joint – articular restriction mobilized into extension
Align
Pelvis: Cue given: Think of headlights on road when walking
Thorax: Cue given: Fish hook and suspend cue at the spinous process of T4 taught in order to create space between TR4 and TR5
Connect
The multifidi in the thoracic region were cued with the same fish hook axial lengthening cue
Move
Weight shifting in standing keeping thorax and pelvis stacked using align/connect cues above
Further Followup Sessions
Thorax driver associated with neural and visceral vectors.
Standing screen and changes with L OLS
FU#1
Pelvis:
L TPR/L IPT in standing, the L SIJ unlocked in L OLS and the pelvis remained in a L TPR in L OLS
Thorax:
TR3 L rotated/R translated – remains the same in L OLS
TR4 L rotated/R translated – remains the same in L OLS
TR 5 R rotated/L translated – moves further into R rotation/L translation
TR8 R rotated/L translated – mains the same in L OLS
Correction of TR3 corrected TR4, TR 5, the pelvis and the L hip
Thoracic rotation and flexion were briefly screened as these pertain to tasks of walking and lower body dressing respectively. The movement in the upper thorax was reduced in these tasks when TR3 was not held corrected.
Diane’s comment:
Primary changes here are pelvis TPR and TR3
Hips:
L hip anterior relative to the pelvis; no anterior shear – remained the same in L OLS
Diane’s comment:
The L hip is now incongruent to the pelvis.
FU #1 Driver
Thorax
Diane’s question:
Did correcting the thorax (all rings/some rings/which ones?) center the L hip?
Susannah’s response:
Yes correction of TR3 corrected the L hip in standing and in L OLS.
FU#2
Again, completing a head-neck (HN) rotation screen with the FU #1 drivers corrected did not change HN rotation, therefore FU #2 was not assessed further.
FU#3
The left foot rested in pronation.
Final drivers for L OLS screening task
Primary driver:
Thorax
Further Assessment of the Thorax
Active mobility
When TR3 was assessed individually in rotation for the task of walking and flexion for lower body dressing, TR3 remained in L rotation/R translation
Active control
Not tested at this time as vectors of restriction were still present.
Passive mobility
Correct, release and listen of the third thoracic ring with a light neural correction gave slight improvement. The vector here felt like the intercostals between the 3rd and 4th rib. When a stronger biomechanical correction of elevation and distraction was used on TR3 a full correction was possible. Holding this correction improved the ease of both R rotation and corrected the L hip. This vector felt deeper and on the left side of the thorax. The fibrous and visceral pericardium is in this region and this was assessed further with Barral methods to triangulate.
Passive control
Not tested as restrictive vectors were still present.
Summary of RACM treatment
The ISM treatment protocol of RACM – Release, Align, Connect, Move was followed.
Release
Thorax: TR3 intercostal release with ring stack and breathe; pericardial vector released
Active control
After the TR3 was released, lack of active control was noted.
Align
Thorax: Fish hook cue used at TR3 to create space and facilitate recruitment of the segmental stabilizers at TR3
Connect
A cue to recruit the upper fibres of transverse abdominis (TrA) was given to address a small rib flare that occurred when aligning the thorax. More connection to the upper TrA and diaphragm was encouraged by emphasizing a ‘connected’ lateral costal breath, first in sitting, then standing and walking.
Move
Stage one exercises
Started as weight shifting while maintaining cues to facilitate the neutral position of TR3. Once this was mastered, lifting the arm to 90 degrees and maintaining neutral position of TR3 was added to provide more challenge for upper thorax active control. Although this arm raise is much higher than what is used for walking, the arm acts a weight that challenges thoracic control. This arm raise was progressed to 130 degrees and finally 160 degrees while active control was monitored. The other functional unit areas were monitored for relative position and for task congruent biomechanics.
Stage two exercises
A light then medium resistance band was added to the arm raise task. More resistance was added only when TR3 active control was maintained.
Stage three exercises
Were added in the 4th session. These consisted of functional movements incorporating balance and functional movements in standing including roll downs and one leg stance with opposite arm elevation.
Summary
After 8 sessions the patient was able to return to her usual way of dressing and walking, free from thinking about her hip. Once this improved, Mrs W brought up another meaningful task she wanted help with and the process began again. Mrs W expressed her appreciation that the time was taken to give her understanding of how intertwined her nervous system was in how she functioned on a daily basis. Having small strategies to self-manage life’s hiccups and new resources to connect with for support made all the difference.
Skills Demonstration
Case Study Author
Clinical Mentorship in the Integrated Systems Model
Join Diane, and her team of highly skilled assistants, on this mentorship journey and immerse yourself in a series of education opportunities that will improve your clinical efficacy for treating the whole person using the updated Integrated Systems Model.
We will come together for 3 sessions of 4 (4.5) days over a period of 6-8 months with lots of practical/clinical time to focus on acquiring the skills and clinical reasoning to put the ISM model into practice. Hours of online lecture and reading material and 12 hours of in-person lecture are...
More Info